Michael Kera
Real people. Real problems. Using non professional actors can sometimes give a sense of realism. Finding a real person with real problems work. Everyone is an actor. If you find someone real who has gone though the situation of the character you are placing him or her into comes easier. We talked about actors in class once; there are method actors and character actors. Method actors try to experience what their character has experienced, like Heath Ledger in The Dark Knight, and then Character Actors like Sarah Michelle Geller who I cannot separate from Buffy. If you find a father with no job and two children to feed, and that is your character, desperation should come easier to him than Mr. Monopoly.
I would say most of that movie was shot on-location. Since the genre follows normal people, you would have to be on location for the shoots. But now, if you wanted to shoot something like this, you would need permits, money, and connections; unless you were using your house. I don't know how it was back in that time period, but now a days it is difficult to shoot in a church, even for a wedding. The service probably was not a real service, but I am curious to know if it was actually shot in a church or on a set.

This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteAnother stellar entry Michael. I think because of your training in film at Webster, you can really put your theoretical ideas into the perspective of the filmmaker which makes your entries more textural....
ReplyDeleteI'm positive they shot on location, because who can build a set like that with no government funding (Mussolini as Fascist dictator at that time)? Its interesting to think of how hard it must have been to shoot a film like this. Because the films of the neorealist movement, with their solidarity to anti-fascist beliefs and expression, had to be shot in secret, particularly in the case of Rossellini's Rome: Open City (sometimes just called Open City) which depicts the abuse, by the fascist govt, of priests performing social services. Its tragic and it was really happening, and obviously the perpetrators performing torture and inquisition did not like being exposed internationally in films. That was a very controversial film at the time.
Anyway, obviously you are absolutely right about the realism of Ladri di biciclette, with its low budget used as a stylistic choice as much as it was necessity, as a critique of real life problems.
Thanks for posting.